{ require_once('class.compressor.php'); //Include the class. The full path may be required } $compressor = new compressor('css,javascript,page'); Left In Aboite: The Independent Candidate <$BlogMetaData>


Saturday, August 12, 2006

The Independent Candidate


In his nationally televised concession speech after his loss Ned Lamont this week, Joe Lieberman announced his intention to run as an independent and appealed for support and campaign contributions. A new Zogby Interactive poll shows he shouldn't waste too much time waiting by the mailbox.


An overwhelming 79% of Democrats nationwide said they are glad that the three-term senator was defeated by Lamont's powerful anti-Iraq war campaign. They also said Lamont's victory over one of the few pro-war Democrats in Washington makes them optimistic they can win control of at least one of the two houses of Congress in November.

The survey also highlighted what Democrats across the country said they want to hear from their candidates. . .a resolute opposition to the war. 78% of Democrats said they want candidates who oppose the conflict while just 6% said they think their Democratic candidates should support the war. Another 13% said they want their candidates to take a middling stance somewhere between support and opposition.

While Republicans may have used the war for political success in 2002 and 2004, Democrats are ready for their turn at the plate this November, and the defeat of Lieberman is the first step. . . 62% said they believe the Connecticut primary results will hold national implications for the fall elections.A full 70% said they think the Lamont victory makes the Democratic Party stronger heading into the important election season.

Until this week, Democrats had mostly failed to define themselves in this midterm election, but the Lamont victory may be a turning point for them. Their collective voice is now loud and clear.

Opposition to the war is creating a unity in the Democratic Party, and the Lamont candidacy both fed off and grew that unity. Lieberman also helped unify the Democrats . . . an overwhelming majority (71%) said they were unhappy with his decision to run as an independent in the November general election.

Which means there aren't many Democrats left to write support letters to Joe, let alone checks.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

9 Comments:

Blogger LP Mike Sylvester said...

I am pretty sure if I lived in his State I would vote for Joe...

Mike Sylvester

title="comment permalink">August 12, 2006 8:27 PM  
Blogger John Good said...

I am pretty sure that I am not surprised. . .

title="comment permalink">August 12, 2006 9:28 PM  
Blogger PTCruiser said...

Good response, John. I read Mike's blog. It reads like a train-wreck.

I love the "W" picture. Awesome.

title="comment permalink">August 12, 2006 10:39 PM  
Blogger LP Mike Sylvester said...

PTCruiser:

I just checked out your blog.

Glad to see there are still some wackjobs in San Francisco...

Mike Sylvester

title="comment permalink">August 12, 2006 11:34 PM  
Blogger Donnie McDaniel said...

And that's supposed to be a suprise Mike? LOL. Looks like we all have our own lil pet wingers. I have a lil asshat from La that is just so annoying. He is something else. The first comment he ever gave, he agreed with me, then within minutes, came back and attacked me. LOL. Now he has a problem with the name of my blog, and says that he is much more liberal than me, while he attacks me for talking about Bush.

Funny thing is, that I never said I was liberal on any of my post, while Katrina did push me that direction.

PT, Hey buddy. "Trainwreck" ROFLMAO!!!!

title="comment permalink">August 13, 2006 6:44 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

The last sentence is the most telling..he will be hitting golf balls soon if he doesn't find some money..lets hope the gravytrain has dried up on Holy Joe :)

title="comment permalink">August 13, 2006 10:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is Tom Hayhurst paying attention? What is his stance on Iraq? Souder is vulnerable but Dr Tom has to promote himself as an alternative. This is his issue and he should drive it right through the heart of Mark Souder.

Tom is an Air Force vet and Souder was a concientious objector. Tom has the credibility to forcefully speak out against this war.

WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?

It's time for a change. You CANNOT win going down the path you are on now. Stop listening to whoever is telling you otherwise. There's still time to make a difference. Just stand up and speak out - we're waiting for a leader. If you do this, myself and many others would come out of the woodwork to support you.

Make Souder earn it. Don't let him skate by w/o being challenged. It's time to mount a serious attack - this is your only shot at victory.

Your move Dr Tom...

title="comment permalink">August 13, 2006 10:58 AM  
Blogger LP Mike Sylvester said...

Jeff Pruitt:

Once again your post is right on target...

Dr. Tom needs to move out a tell us SPECIFICALLY what he advocates.

He has NOT done that yet.

Mike Sylvester

title="comment permalink">August 15, 2006 3:40 PM  
Blogger John Good said...

Jeff and Mike,

I have forwarded your concerns to Dr.Hayhurst, but I would strongly suggest that you also contact him with your thoughts. They will mean more to him that way than through a third party.

title="comment permalink">August 15, 2006 6:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

$compressor->finish();