Minimum wage increase tied to tax cuts
Well. . .here they go again. . .
Republican leaders are willing to allow the first minimum wage increase in a decade (from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour, phased in over the next three years ) but only if it's coupled with a cut in future inheritance taxes on multimillion-dollar estates. The plan would also renew several popular tax breaks, including a R&D credit for businesses, and deductions for college tuition and state sales taxes. The clear aim of this maneuver is to defuse the minimum wage issue as a campaign issue for Dems , while serving the base with the GOP's long-sought goal of permanently cutting taxes on millionaires' estates.
Democratic senators were quick to fire back:
"It's political blackmail to say the only way that minimum wage workers can get a raise is to give a tax giveaway to the wealthiest Americans.Members of Congress raised their own pay -- no strings attached. Surely, common decency suggests that minimum wage workers deserve the same respect."
- Sen. Edward Kennedy
"It's outrageous the Republican Congress can't simply help poor people without doing something for their wealthy contributors."
- Rep. Tim Ryan
The move comes after almost 50 rank-and-file Republican lawmakers pressed House leaders, who strongly oppose the wage hike and have thus far prevented a vote, to schedule the measure for debate. Democrats have been hammering away on the wage hike issue and have public opinion behind them. In a rare moment of clarity, Rep. Steve LaTourette(R-Ohio)who pushed for the bill, conceded that "We weren't going to be denied. How can you defend $5.15 an hour in today's economy?"
GOP leaders also excluded a measure popular with small businesses that would make it easier for small businesses and the self-employed to band together and buy health insurance plans for employees at a lower cost. Blasted as a "poison pill" by Democrats and labor unions, the small business health insurance bill exempts new "association health plans" from state regulations requiring insurers to cover treatments such as mental health and maternity care. And opponents fear they would offer inferior prescription drug benefits.
Congress last voted to increase the minimum wage during the hotly contested campaign year of 1996. A 40 hours per week job at minimum wage makes $10,700, which is below the poverty line for workers with families. Inflation has eroded the minimum wage's buying power to the lowest level in about 50 years. Yet lawmakers have won cost-of-living wage increases totaling about $35,000 for themselves over that time.
Democrats have made increasing the wage a pillar of their campaign platform and are pushing to raise the wage to $7.25 per hour over two years. In June, the Republican controlled Senate refused to raise the minimum wage, rejecting a proposal from Democrats. It's long been clear that there is wide support for the wage increase in the House, but Republican leaders have a general policy of bringing legislation to the floor only if it has support from a majority of Republicans. Perhaps one-fourth of House Republicans support the wage increase.
Repubican lawmakers fear being pounded with 30-second campaign ads over the August recess that would tie Congress' upcoming $3,300 pay increase with Republicans' refusal to raise the minimum wage. As well they should. . .
10 Comments:
John,
You left out what I think is the most dispicable part of the story. The Republican House brought this bill out under "martial law".
Normally, once a bill comes out of committee, there must be a 24hr waiting period giving all members a chance to review the legislation (24 hrs is still not enough). However, the House continues to push bills out under "martial law" which means they don't have to give the mandatory 24 hr notice before a vote.
The bill you are referring to is over 1000 f'in pages long. 1000 pages and not even 24 hrs for review! This is outrageous and I submit that THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY IN ACTION. This is what the current GOP stands for. American conservatives need to understand what they're voting for because I have a hunch VERY few would support this end-run around democracy...
Jeff - Thank you for bringing this up. I am rather rushed this evening, and wasn't even aware of that facet of this story. Do you have any links that we can direct readers to that will explain this in greater detail?
Read at your own displeasure
It's an outrage!! I heard this last night, and thought my head would explode.
"Martial law" is an evil procedure.
Democrats used it when they were in power and now The Republicans are doing the exact same thing.
It was wrong when the Democrats did it.
The Republicans are wrong to do it now.
Libertarians would not do it at all.
Vote Libertarian...
Mike Sylvester
Mike,
The LP bloggers continue to treat both parties equal w/o any evidence to support their claims. Your post is a prime example - please be specific where the dems have used this in the past. I'm not sure they haven't, but if you're going to make those claims then you should back them up. I do know that this GOP House has invoked "martial law" about 30 times.
The GOP control the congress, the executive branch and essentially the judiciary. There cannot be equal blame for both parties. I understand you want to promote the LP but dragging democrats into the mix w/ this republican administration and congress is unfair...
Jeff Pruitt:
First of all, the last 30 uses of Martial Law by the Republicans is despicable... I keep saying that. I am not defending The Republcians and there is no way you can think that I am if you read my posts...
I have done some basic research on this and there is NO DOUBT that the Democrats have been doing this for decades in one form or another.
For example:
For over 30 years Democrats have added language to bills within the 24 hours BEFORE the vote and in fact, they often add language after the vote.
I have seen one case where a Democratic Congressman has added an Earmark to a Transportation Bill AFTER the vote...
That is one of the reasons I think that every elected offical should be required to read each bill. I think that no one should be allowed to change the bill in the 24 hours before the vote or anytime after the vote.
That is not the case.
The Dems are just as bad as The Reps on this one Jeff...
Whichever party is in power abuses power more and is more corrupt.
There is NO DOUBT about this partner.
Mike Sylvester
Reading for Jeff Pruitt:
http://www.downsizedc.org/read_the_laws.shtml
Please go and checkout Downsize DC.
You should join this group like I have.
I joined this group due to abuse of power (Mainly by Democrats)in the 1990's. Now the Republicans are doing the same thing...
Mike Sylvester
Jeff Pruitt - When Dems like you are in control of the Party I'll come back to it. After seeing for decades that there is not much difference between the parties I left. It was the only direction I could go. Since the Party is too far right.
Peace.
Jeff Pruitt:
If the Democratic Party were controlled by poeple like Jeff Pruitt I would vote for more Democrats then I currently do.
I would still prefer Libertarians; but ...
Mike Sylvester
Post a Comment
<< Home