{ require_once('class.compressor.php'); //Include the class. The full path may be required } $compressor = new compressor('css,javascript,page'); Left In Aboite: Tom Hayhurst on Energy <$BlogMetaData>


Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Tom Hayhurst on Energy

Energy

It is time for America to declare its energy independence. Our country's security depends on it. The pocketbooks of working families depend on it. Our ability to compete and create jobs depends on it. Our innovation future depends on it. And the natural environment we all inhabit and rely upon depends on it.

We start by making it our national priority. Then we take action. We launch a total-commitment initiative that links the best in our private and public sectors together to turn American ingenuity into America's new energy. The missing ingredient today is leadership. And that is why this election is so important.

As a physician for over 30 years, I know you save lives by making smart decisions and taking action. As a City Councilman for 10 years, I know you build strong communities by rolling up your sleeves and getting to work – solving problems, not ignoring them or putting our country at risk. We need that determination now. We need that kind of fresh thinking, free from the grip of special interests, in Congress.

Northeast Indiana is well positioned to be a leader in our move toward energy independence. We are a region that makes things and makes them well. That manufacturing know-how can be transformed into high-mileage, emission-friendly cars, trucks, RVs and boats. It can be put into a high-speed, energy-efficient rail system to boost regional and national commerce and connectivity.

We are an area with a rich farming tradition and respect for the earth. Those skills give us an edge in the development of biofuels and other renewable forms of energy. The land that feeds us can become the land that fuels us, converting the crops we grow into the power behind our dreams.

When I am in the U.S. Congress, I will:

• Campaign for a national commitment to energy independence and a comprehensive, commonsense plan to advance it.

• Fight to make America more secure by lessening our dependence on foreign oil.

• Support incentives for the development and use of biofuels, renewable fuels and alternative energy sources, the raw materials for many grown here on our farms.

• Promote policies and programs that encourage conservation and energy efficiency.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

7 Comments:

Blogger Lew Scannon said...

Unfortunatley this candidates common sense will be drowned out by the exploitation of a national tragedy by a party who only seems concerned with the military solution to national security.

title="comment permalink">September 13, 2006 10:19 PM  
Blogger John Good said...

Lew - They're not even waiting on that; they're attempting to take him down on the local level.

http://indiana.typepad.com/fwob/2006/09/paging_dr_hayhu.html

title="comment permalink">September 13, 2006 10:30 PM  
Blogger Andrew Kaduk said...

I think his inability and/or unwillingness to answer questions and state his position are bringing him down more than any vast right wing conspiracy, John. Meanwhile, the God-Awful Souder Train rolls on...

title="comment permalink">September 13, 2006 11:14 PM  
Blogger LP Mike Sylvester said...

You can rest assured of one thing...

I would vote for Mickey Mouse LONG before I would vote for Mark Souder.

Mike Sylvester

title="comment permalink">September 14, 2006 2:31 PM  
Blogger John Good said...

Andy - Nobody claimed a "vast right-wing conspiracy". Tom's campaign has it's pace and schedule. I am not privy to their strategy, so I can tell you no more.

I have written Souder several times before and recieved either no response or a form letter.

He seems to be putting up a new "plank" each week as of late, and I have been advised that the one on "national security" is coming soon.

Mike - I hear that from many people. I hear that from many Republicans. He is loathed in many ways by many different groups.

Here. . let me toss out some "red meat" to the base: "Mark Souder voted AGAINST impeaching Bill Clinton!!! Teach him a lesson by staying home on election day!" ;)

title="comment permalink">September 14, 2006 9:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please forgive me if my anger boils over for a moment as this is just a continuation of my rant from Reverent and Free:

I see all this wishy-washy stuff coming from Hayhurst but what I want to know (and everyone else for that matter) is where does he stand on IRAQ? This is the #1 issue for Democrats - how can you run a fricking campaign and have not addressed the #1 issue with less than 60 days until the election?

I have friends that have been in Iraq and could possibly be sent back. These people DESERVE an answer from every politician about why they should risk their life in Iraq. Even if they don't agree w/ the rational they should at least be privy to it. It's outlandish that a DEMOCRATIC party politician hasn't answered this question.

Dr Tom,

You CANNOT AND WILL NOT win w/o addressing this concern. Moreover, you will not get my vote until you do...

title="comment permalink">September 14, 2006 11:27 PM  
Blogger John Good said...

Jeff - Breathe. =) As I just commented, I have been advised that his "national security" statement is forthcoming.

title="comment permalink">September 15, 2006 8:13 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

$compressor->finish();